During Yoon Suk-yeol's term, we never even hit 3000, and most of the time it was below 2500... These biased journalists are disgusting.
Anyone looking at this would think 3600 is the baseline.
The Nasdaq futures are up 1.78%, but these biased journalists only focus on KOSPI and are acting like biased journalists...
Looking at the US market situation, I expected the Korean stock market to receive some shock this morning.
And because I was curious about how the media would express this trend, I looked at the articles posted on the ‘Daum’ portal.
But still, why is 3600 acting like some kind of support line?
For the first time in history, we broke through the 3600 line right in front of our eyes, but I don't understand why they use the word ‘collapse.’
Moreover, if you look carefully at today's market trend, after a sharp decline at the beginning of the session, it is showing a quick recovery.
Wouldn't it be more accurate to express it not as ‘collapse’ but as “declining due to US stock market impact, but showing a quick rebound” instead?
Of course, since the session is still early, I'll have to keep watching how it develops.
Looking at the media coverage, I even get the feeling that they hope the market will collapse.
