When the seller is in a forced sale position
there doesn't seem to be any advantage.
The buyer can easily target this and negotiate, and can more easily bet on put options where the value of the seller's underlying assets declines. (Feeling good when buying cheap)
Therefore, the seller hedges the sale for the reason of a forced sale before the value of the underlying asset (used bicycle price) drops further.
The effect that can be obtained is opportunity cost hedging is possible. (Won't change the model? Won't abandon the dogma???) By pre-purchasing a model to upgrade to and then selling the existing bicycle with a slight discount for quick sale, or similar means, one can minimize the time opportunity cost of looking into and checking listings.
But the buyer should be careful here.
The buyer gets hooked by the title, but when they actually look inside
they see listings that don't make sense about what the forced sale is or what's being offered.
The price is high or the condition is not good for the price.
Therefore
The buyer should not respond to the forced sale but look a bit further ahead
and check whether this price is appropriate by comparing with the average market price of similar models and whether new models are being released, and then decide on the right purchase timing.
Finally,
although it varies depending on the person,
with a relatively high probability,
the reason the seller is in a forced sale position is essentially close to buying time.
That's the conclusion.
